I was Thinking, or Not

I shall sit here in this liquid room Surrounded by my memories Shrouded in a darkness of knowledge From whence it came I can not guess And I will surpress my desire to live And I will deny myself of happiness And I will consume my thoughts And I will exist, but that is all I will allow that which should be To come from the blindness I see And if they are as such let it be As who am I, I still question thee I will sleep in this summer sky No longer a product of the eye But what I chose not to see Will then be mine and endlessly Nothing I will hold Nothing do I need Nothing is all Nothing will become me At some time continuum They will ask where, why, and how And I will refrain from answering Given they knew to much then as well

I am forever at a loss at the ignorance of others, and their complete inability to observe all but their prescribed doctrine. The point at which I am thinking, and wondering does anyone think at all, and I am reminded that perhaps they do think, but in limited view, and there is nothing I am going to do about it. I sometimes question my own existence, for it's purpose, as it would seem that most likely I was not "put here" to help others see, then what other purpose could I serve in. Any such capacity as I have availed myself of seems pale in comparison, and in truth I feel very inadequate to perform in a capacity that would seem less than desirable. Given this and that I obviously suffer from complexes of the mind, provided that I seem to have to complex a mind, leaves me with little option. I can't seem to understand how people can't understand the simplest of concepts, provided they understand language at all, and yet it does seem that more often than not

This is a comment I made on Mike's Blog on MySpace, in response to a comment by another commenter . I hate to be the barer of such, but you assumption that I assumed is incorrect, in that I based my "assumptions" from your misunderstanding, which is not uncommon, but actually the precise education achieved through years of public education. That you believe that the Constitution is a document that gives us freedom from the obligation to the British Crown, you therefore do not understand the language of the Constitution. The belief that General George Washington was fighting for our freedom is a gross misconception. The Continental United States of America were fighting for representation not independence in the sense that we are made to believe. That you as well do not know me, as I do not know you, I was responding directly to your words, as you provided, and given that you continue with your belief indicates that you are yet to understand that I am not an advocate

So far they have killed several people but nothing seems to come of it. Be on the look out for further post on Noir. I am writing a new blog, but you won't be able to see it, so who cares.

This post by a good friend of mine, provides a great parable of the times. Check it out on his MySpace blog.

I was not going to directly reply to this, but you give me no choice. Now first as Mike already knows me, I will give you the benefit of the doubt. Second, I do not believe you understand what the USA or the Constitution is. First the Constitution was a charter made by the "founding fathers" between the colonies of the new British Corporation (see James Town), and the British Crown. With the exception of the preamble which is what most people are familiar with, the rest of the document has no baring on the people of the colonies, but on how business with the new corporation will be conducted. I think you are confusing the Constitution with the Bill of Rights, which was mostly penned by John Hancock, designed to give the citizens of the new corporation some protection from the power of the corporation (sort of like a trade union agreement). Furthermore, it is to late to do anything about the situation you and Mike are talking about, we were sold out long before any of us

On Google Books: Access I believe that I as the user should be able to set the access that I need for any particular value of books.  In a library I do not get charged for a book unless I do not return it.  In a situation such as the electronic library it would be difficult to impose such restrictions, and still offer the full text as I believe that should be available to the user, if they so desire it.  Full text should never be the default, although providing the user with the option to make it their particular setting would also be useful.  However the details of such a program by which one should have to pay some fee for access, as Google no doubt should have to pay to host such access, although to be perfectly honest, I do not put stock in the publishing industry, who nearly always takes more than they are worth, providing writers with the least they can negotiate, and although I do not begrudge them the ability to negotiate, it is my hope that electronic publishing will soon leve

A sane individual may state that all this talk of economic recovery, and the associated government policies being put through congress is a positive movement. I have read a lot about them lately, especially the white house blog , and to me it is scary. I am concerned that to much to fast is being done, but a lot needs to be done in a hurry to stem the tide. These programs put forth, the recovery act, the mortgage act, the banking act, all are probably necessary, but they are hard to swallow. It is the speed at which these programs are being accepted that is kind of scaring me. That and the fact that there seems to be a lot of transparency, but I am always concerned when they say to much, because it always make me wonder what are they hiding behind the smoke screens. The second point is how everything seems to be working for this President. The first lady is campaigning for him, the vice president is working on projects, everything seems to be working all to well, and that concern